Commission
Research
All research areas →

Agent Evaluation and Coordination

Generated-Code and GPU-Kernel Correctness

Federated Learning and Privacy

Decentralised Systems and Protocol

Methods
Papers
Collaborate
About Contact Bring a technical claim
Back to patents
202011016567 Provisional Application

Method of Intimating Experience/Activity to a User

Indian Patent Office

This patent introduces an innovative method for keeping users informed about their activities and experiences in a more meaningful and contextual way. As the inventor, I recognized that traditional notification systems often overwhelm users with information without considering the right moment or context for delivery.

The core idea revolves around creating an intelligent intimation system that understands user behavior patterns, activity context, and optimal moments for engagement. Rather than simply pushing notifications, this method evaluates multiple factors including:

  • The user’s current activity state
  • Historical interaction patterns
  • Environmental context
  • Activity importance and urgency
  • User’s attention capacity

By analyzing these factors, the system makes informed decisions about when and how to intimate users about their activities and experiences. This approach significantly reduces notification fatigue while ensuring that important information reaches users at the most receptive moments.

The practical applications of this technology span across various domains, from personal productivity apps to healthcare monitoring systems. For instance, a fitness application implementing this method would know the ideal time to remind users about their exercise goals, considering their daily routine, current activity, and past responsiveness to notifications.

This innovation addresses a critical challenge in our increasingly connected world: maintaining effective communication with users without contributing to information overload. The method’s adaptive nature ensures that it becomes more personalized and effective over time, leading to improved user engagement and satisfaction.

Why timing matters more than content

Most notification systems treat the “what” and the “when” as separate problems: a rules engine decides that an event is notification-worthy, and delivery happens as soon as the rule fires. That design assumes every moment is equally good for interrupting the user, which is rarely true. A reminder that arrives mid-meeting, mid-workout, or mid-conversation gets the same dismissive swipe regardless of how important the underlying information actually is — the user never evaluates the content, because the timing already told them it wasn’t worth their attention.

Treating timing as a first-class signal — not an afterthought to a content rule — means the system has to maintain some model of what the user is likely doing right now, not just what happened that triggered the notification. That’s a meaningfully harder problem than content filtering: it requires inferring activity state from whatever signals are available (app usage, device motion, calendar state, time of day, historical response patterns) and combining them into a single receptiveness estimate.

The trade-off against real-time delivery

There’s an inherent tension in any system that delays or reorders notifications based on inferred context: the more it optimizes for the “right moment,” the more it risks delivering time-sensitive information late. A security alert or a message from a family member shouldn’t wait for an inferred lull in the user’s attention. That means a practical implementation of this kind of system needs an urgency tier that bypasses the contextual reasoning entirely for a small class of events, while applying the full receptiveness model to everything else — the majority of notifications, which are informative rather than urgent.

Where the personalization comes from

The adaptive element described above — the system getting better over time — comes from treating each user’s response to a delivered notification (opened immediately, dismissed, ignored, opened later) as a training signal for that user’s own receptiveness model, rather than relying on a single global policy tuned across all users. Two people with identical calendars and app usage can have very different tolerances for interruption, and a system that only ever learns a population-average policy will systematically over-notify some users and under-notify others. Per-user adaptation is what lets the same underlying method serve a fitness app’s exercise reminders and a healthcare app’s medication alerts without either domain having to hand-tune delivery rules for every possible user pattern.

User ExperienceActivity TrackingNotification Systems

Related Content